KMID : 0354719900140020185
|
|
Journal of Korean Diabetes Association 1990 Volume.14 No. 2 p.185 ~ p.189
|
|
Fasting Serum C-Peptide, GlucagonStimulated Serum C-Peptide and Urinary C-Peptide in Clinical Classification of Diabetes
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
We studies fasting serum C-peptide, glucagon stimulated serum C-peptide, and 24h urinary C-peptide in relation to clinical type of diabetes. Patients were classified as typical IDDM in the presence of the following criteria: 1) age of diagnosis ¡Â 40 years, 2) body mass index below 25, 3) positive urine or plasma ketone bodies and/or 4) insulin treatment started within one year after diatnosis. Paients were classified as typical NIDDM in the presence of the fllowing criteria: 1) age of diagnosis v 40 yeaes, 2) body mass index ¡Ã 20, 3) negative urinary ketone bodies and 4) no history of insulin treatment (for at least 1 year after diagnosis). Among 17 patients with typical IDDM, fasting serum C-peptide levels were below 0.6ng/§¢ in 13 patients and were higher than 1.0ng/§¢ in 3 patients. Fasting serum C-peptide levels were also hiher than 1.0ng/§¢ in 83 out of 85 typical NIDDM patients and were below 0.6ng/§¢ in only 1 out of 85 patients. Postglucagon C-peptide levels were below 1.0v in 9 out of 14 IDDM patients and were higher than 1.8ng/§¢ in 38 out of 40 NIDDM patients. 24h urinary C-peptide exeretion was less than 10 §¡ in 7 out of 16 IDDM patients and was more than 30 §¡ in 47 out of 56 NIDDM patients. From these results, we conclude that fasting serum C-peptide gives a good distinction between IDDM and NIDDM.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|